EN
Have you ever wondered why a highly anticipated product can sometimes leave users feeling let down? This is exactly what happened with GPT-5, the latest update from OpenAI. Initially, it was expected to be a groundbreaking advancement in artificial intelligence, promising smarter and faster interactions. However, the reality turned out to be quite different, leading to widespread disappointment among users.
GPT-5 is the newest version of OpenAI's language model, designed to improve upon its predecessors. It was supposed to enhance reasoning, summarizing, and handling complex tasks. However, many users quickly noticed that the experience was not as expected.
Before its release, the hype around GPT-5 was immense. OpenAI's CEO, Sam Altman, even teased the launch with exciting imagery, raising expectations to new heights. Users anticipated a model that would revolutionize their interactions, perhaps even hinting at the dawn of AGI (Artificial General Intelligence).
However, once GPT-5 was launched, users began to express their frustrations. Many reported that the model felt dumber and more robotic than its predecessor, GPT-4. The responses were shorter, the tone was colder, and the model seemed to forget context mid-conversation. This stark contrast between expectations and reality left many feeling disappointed.
| Feature | GPT-4 | GPT-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Response Length | Longer and detailed | Shorter |
| Tone | Friendly and engaging | Cold and robotic |
| Context Retention | Good | Poor |
| User Satisfaction | High | Low |
OpenAI's decision to roll out GPT-5 without a toggle option for users to switch back to GPT-4 added to the frustration. This sudden change left many feeling as if they had lost a valuable tool without any warning.
Moreover, the introduction of a message limit for GPT-5's thinking mode further aggravated users. Even paid subscribers found themselves hitting caps, leading to questions about the value of their subscriptions. Users began to wonder, what exactly are they paying for?
In conclusion, the rollout of GPT-5 serves as a reminder that while technological advancements are exciting, user experience and feedback are equally important. As OpenAI works to address these concerns, it is crucial for them to listen to their users and ensure that future updates meet the expectations set by their predecessors.
Why are users feeling disappointed with GPT-5? Many expected it to be a groundbreaking update, but instead, it has sparked frustration. Users have taken to platforms like Reddit and Hacker News to express their dissatisfaction. They describe the new model as feeling dumber and more robotic compared to its predecessor, GPT-4. The sudden switch to GPT-5 without any warning left many feeling blindsided.
Users have reported several common complaints about GPT-5. They mention that responses are shorter and the tone feels cold and less natural. Some users even compared it to a glorified FAQ bot. The model also seems to forget context during conversations, which is frustrating for those who rely on it for detailed discussions.
Despite being technically more advanced, GPT-5 has not delivered a better user experience. In fact, many users feel it lacks the emotional intelligence that made GPT-4 appealing. A side-by-side comparison shows that while GPT-5 scored higher on benchmarks, it often produced less accurate and more confident-sounding answers that were incorrect. This has led to a growing sentiment that GPT-5 feels colder and less engaging.
| Feature | GPT-4 | GPT-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Response Length | Longer | Shorter |
| Tone | Friendly | Cold |
| Context Retention | Good | Poor |
| Accuracy | Higher | Lower |
The rollout of GPT-5 has raised questions about OpenAI's approach to user feedback. Many users feel that their needs were overlooked in favor of technical advancements. As a result, they are calling for a return to the more relatable and human-like interactions they enjoyed with GPT-4.
Why are users feeling let down by GPT-5? This question has been on the minds of many since its launch. Initially, GPT-5 was expected to be a groundbreaking advancement in AI technology. However, the reality has been quite different. Users have reported that the new model feels less intelligent and more robotic compared to its predecessor, GPT-4. The excitement quickly turned into disappointment as many found the interactions to be less engaging and more mechanical.
One of the major issues was a router glitch that affected the model's performance. OpenAI's smart model router, which is supposed to balance speed and intelligence, failed right after the launch. This caused GPT-5 to operate only in its fast mode, resulting in shorter responses and a colder tone. Users felt like they were talking to a basic FAQ bot rather than an advanced AI.
Another frustration came from the usage limits imposed on GPT-5. Users were capped at 200 messages per week, which affected both free and paid subscribers. This sudden restriction left many wondering what they were paying for. The combination of a glitchy model and strict limits led to a significant backlash from the community.
| Feature | GPT-4 | GPT-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Response Length | Longer | Shorter |
| Tone | Friendly | Cold |
| Usage Limit | No Limit | 200 messages/week |
| User Satisfaction | High | Low |
Why are people feeling disappointed with GPT-5? After its much-anticipated launch, many users expected a groundbreaking upgrade. Instead, they found a model that felt less intuitive and more robotic. The initial excitement quickly turned into frustration as users reported shorter responses and a lack of context retention. This shift left many wondering if the improvements were worth the hype.
OpenAI faced a backlash almost immediately after the rollout. Users were unhappy with the sudden replacement of GPT-4, which they loved, with GPT-5. OpenAI acknowledged the issues, including a glitch in their smart model router that affected performance. They promised to restore GPT-4 as an option and increase message limits, but the damage to user trust was already done.
The rollout of GPT-5 raised significant concerns about user trust. Many users felt that their needs were ignored, leading to a sense of loss. They wanted a model that was not only smarter but also reliable and familiar. The emotional connection that previous versions offered seemed to vanish with GPT-5, causing users to question the direction OpenAI was taking.
| Feature | GPT-4 | GPT-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Response Length | Longer and detailed | Shorter and less informative |
| Tone | Conversational and friendly | Cold and robotic |
| Context Retention | Good | Poor |
| User Satisfaction | High | Low |
