- ResourcesOnline Tools
EN
VPNs are old news. You changed your IP address and felt safe. Meanwhile the website you just visited already logged your GPU renderer, your installed fonts, your screen resolution, your timezone offset, your audio stack signature, and the exact way your browser draws an invisible canvas element — and none of that changed when you hit connect on your VPN.
You were never anonymous. You were just slightly harder to find by the most basic tools. Modern tracking infrastructure doesn't care about your IP anymore. It cares about your device. And your device has a fingerprint so specific it might as well be your name written across every website you visit.
This is the reality of tracking in 2026. And this guide is about what actually works against it.
Third-party cookies are functionally dead. Safari blocked them years ago. Firefox followed. Chrome finally completed its deprecation push after years of delays and the entire ad-tech industry had to rebuild its tracking infrastructure from scratch.
What they rebuilt is significantly more invasive than what came before.
Cookies required your browser to store something and send it back. You could delete them. You could block them. You had at least nominal control over the mechanism. Fingerprinting requires nothing to be stored anywhere. It just reads what your browser and device already are.
A combination of hundreds of attributes forms a profile so unique that researchers at the Electronic Frontier Foundation found over 80% of browsers in their study had a fingerprint that was one-of-a-kind in their dataset of millions.
No storage. No consent required. No opt-out that actually works. Just passive, continuous, invisible identification every time your browser touches a web server.
The practical consequences of fingerprinting go well beyond theoretical privacy concerns. Social media platforms use it to link accounts they suspect belong to the same operator.
E-commerce platforms use it to identify and ban accounts engaged in arbitrage or bulk purchasing. Ad networks use it to cap frequency across incognito sessions. Fraud detection systems use it to flag accounts that share device characteristics.
If you run multiple accounts for any legitimate professional reason, fingerprinting is the mechanism that gets them all banned simultaneously when one of them triggers a rule.
Canvas fingerprinting is the most widely deployed and least understood tracking method in active use. Here is the actual mechanism.
Every browser has a hidden HTML5 canvas element that can be used to draw graphics. When a tracking script runs canvas fingerprinting, it instructs your browser to draw a specific image and then reads the pixel data of the result.
The pixel output varies based on your GPU, your GPU driver version, your operating system's rendering stack, and your browser's anti-aliasing implementation. The combination produces a value that is statistically near-unique across devices.
This happens in milliseconds. You never see it. You cannot block it with an ad blocker without breaking rendering functionality across the web.
WebGL fingerprinting goes deeper than canvas. It queries your GPU directly through the browser's WebGL API and extracts the renderer string, the vendor string, and the specific output of a series of 3D rendering operations.
Your renderer string alone is already highly identifying. Combined with the numerical output of WebGL rendering operations, it creates a secondary fingerprint that correlates with and reinforces the canvas fingerprint.
Platforms running serious fraud detection run both simultaneously and cross-reference the outputs.
The AudioContext API was built for web audio processing. It also happens to produce a unique numerical signature based on how your device's audio hardware and software stack processes a specific test signal.
No sound plays. No microphone is accessed. The API just processes a silent audio graph through your hardware and reads the mathematical output. Small floating-point variations produce a value that is again near-unique per device.
Your browser knows which fonts are installed on your system. Not because it asks for a list, because a fingerprinting script can test for the presence of specific fonts by measuring how text renders in different typefaces.
The pattern of which fonts are present and absent is another identifying attribute. Combined with canvas, WebGL, AudioContext, timezone, screen resolution, language settings, hardware concurrency, and device memory reporting, the total fingerprint has a near-zero false positive rate for re-identification.
An anti-detect browser does not hide your fingerprint. Hiding a fingerprint is detectable in itself. A browser that produces no canvas output, or wildly inconsistent fingerprint attributes, is flagged immediately by modern detection systems as a bot or a privacy tool.
What Dicloak does is different. It generates complete, internally consistent, believable browser profiles. Each one is a synthetic identity with a coherent set of fingerprint attributes that appear to belong to a real device running a real browser on a real operating system.
Each Dicloak profile runs in a fully isolated environment. Canvas outputs, WebGL renderer strings, AudioContext signatures, font sets, screen parameters, timezone data, and language attributes are all set at the profile level and remain consistent across sessions.
This consistency is what makes the profiles believable. A real user's fingerprint stays the same across visits. A randomly spoofed fingerprint changes every session and gets flagged. Dicloak profiles behave like real users because their fingerprint attributes are stable, coherent, and internally consistent.
Specific isolation capabilities include:
Beyond the technical fingerprint attributes, Dicloak handles the full stack of browser identity. Each profile maintains its own cookie store, local storage, IndexedDB, and cache, completely isolated from every other profile and from your real browser.
Proxy assignment at the profile level means each synthetic identity can be paired with a geographically appropriate IP address, completing the picture of a coherent, believable, distinct user identity.
Retail arbitrage operators managing multiple buyer accounts on platforms with strict single-account policies need browser isolation technology to keep those accounts from being linked and banned simultaneously.
Each account lives in its own Dicloak profile with its own fingerprint, its own cookie store, and its own proxy, appearing to platform detection systems as a distinct customer.
Managing multiple social media accounts across platforms that actively fingerprint browsers to detect multi-account operation is one of the most common professional use cases for anti-detect browsers.
Each client account, each brand profile, each managed identity gets its own isolated environment. No cross-contamination. No account association.
Ad agencies and market research firms use anti-detect browsers to verify how ads appear to users in different regions, on different devices, and across different demographic profiles without triggering frequency caps or personalization that would distort the results.
Journalists working sources in high-surveillance environments and individuals who need to communicate sensitive information without leaving a device-linked trail use browser isolation technology as part of a layered operational security approach.
Digital identity masking at the browser level is one component of that stack.
Affiliate marketers managing multiple traffic sources, tracking links, and campaign accounts across networks with anti-fraud systems use Dicloak profiles to maintain clean separation between accounts and avoid the cross-account association that triggers fraud flags.
Understanding fingerprinting, browser isolation, and digital identity masking is genuinely technical. Most people researching this topic want answers fast, without leaving a detailed search history tied to their identity.
Chatly AI Chat gives you access to 30+ top AI models including GPT-5.2 Pro, Gemini, Grok, and Claude, all from one interface. You can research canvas fingerprinting specifics, compare anti-detect browser options, and pressure-test your understanding of WebGL spoofing without a search engine building an advertising profile around your queries.
Ask one model. Cross-reference with another. Get a complete technical picture without the tracking irony of researching privacy tools on a platform designed to monetize your attention.
Fingerprinting is not a future threat. It is the current standard tracking infrastructure running on the majority of high-traffic websites right now. Your GPU is being queried. Your audio stack is being sampled. Your fonts are being enumerated. And none of the tools you were using three years ago do anything meaningful about any of it.
Anti-detect browsers are not a niche tool for people doing something questionable. They are the technically correct response to a tracking ecosystem that has moved well past anything a VPN or incognito mode was ever designed to address. Dicloak gives you complete, consistent, believable browser profiles, each one a fully isolated digital identity that the modern web's fingerprinting infrastructure cannot connect to your real device or to each other.
