EN
Terra Luna Classic is making headlines again with a new burning proposal aimed at revitalizing the ecosystem. This proposal is distinct from the previously passed 1.2% tax initiative, which is still pending support from exchanges. The community is hopeful that this new proposal will gain traction and lead to effective burns.
The latest proposal seeks to allocate 50% of transaction fees to the community pool, which is designed to enhance validator rewards. This initiative aims to incentivize both existing validators and new projects to engage with the Terra Classic blockchain. With significant community support already, this proposal has garnered 87 million votes and is poised for a promising outcome.
The proposal outlines a clear distribution plan for transaction fees: 35% will be burned through monthly community proposals, 10% will be allocated as airdrops to ecosystem developers, and 5% will be retained for the core Terra team. This structured approach is intended to encourage development on the Terra Classic platform, thereby attracting more projects and validators.
The Terra community has shown remarkable resilience and commitment to reviving Terra Classic, especially in light of the perceived lack of support from founder Do Kwon. Recent discussions highlight the community's proactive stance in proposing viable solutions to restore the ecosystem, which is crucial for its future.
One of the most significant aspects of this proposal is its focus on rewarding validators. The current base proposal rewards validators with 5%, but this new initiative could increase their net rewards to 7.5%. Additionally, 15% of the allocations will be directed towards developers, ensuring they have the necessary incentives to continue building on Terra Classic.
This proposal not only addresses the immediate needs of the Terra Classic ecosystem but also aims to create a deflationary economy. By burning a portion of transaction fees, the supply of Luna Classic and UST could be reduced, enhancing their value as a store of value. The community is optimistic that these measures will help stabilize the ecosystem and attract new users.
With just four days left for voting, the proposal is nearing a quorum, with 95% of participants expressing support. The community is eager to see how these initiatives will unfold and whether they will successfully retain developers and attract new projects. The excitement surrounding this proposal signifies a turning point for Terra Classic, and many are hopeful for a brighter future.
Q: What is Terra Luna Classic?
A: Terra Luna Classic is a blockchain ecosystem that is currently undergoing revitalization efforts, including a new burning proposal aimed at enhancing its sustainability and value.
Q: What is the new burning proposal about?
A: The new burning proposal seeks to allocate 50% of transaction fees to the community pool to enhance validator rewards and incentivize engagement with the Terra Classic blockchain.
Q: How will transaction fees be distributed under the new proposal?
A: Transaction fees will be distributed as follows: 35% will be burned through monthly community proposals, 10% will go to ecosystem developers as airdrops, and 5% will be retained for the core Terra team.
Q: How has the community responded to the new proposal?
A: The Terra community has shown strong support for the new proposal, with 87 million votes already cast in favor, indicating a proactive approach to reviving the ecosystem.
Q: What incentives are being offered to validators and developers?
A: Validators could see their net rewards increase from 5% to 7.5%, while 15% of allocations will be directed towards developers to encourage ongoing development on Terra Classic.
Q: What potential impact could this proposal have on the ecosystem?
A: The proposal aims to create a deflationary economy by burning a portion of transaction fees, which could reduce the supply of Luna Classic and UST, potentially enhancing their value as a store of value.
Q: What is the current status of the proposal?
A: With just four days left for voting, the proposal is nearing a quorum, with 95% of participants expressing support, indicating a significant community backing for the initiatives.