EN
Gemini 3 is the latest version of Google's AI model, designed to enhance various applications, including UI/UX design. It offers advanced capabilities that allow designers to create more engaging and user-friendly interfaces. But what makes it stand out from its predecessors?
Gemini 3 introduces several new features that improve the design process. It can analyze user behavior, generate design suggestions, and even create prototypes. These features help designers save time and improve the overall quality of their work.
With Gemini 3, designers can expect a more streamlined workflow. The AI can assist in generating ideas, which can lead to innovative designs. Additionally, it helps in identifying user preferences, allowing for more personalized experiences. This means designers can focus on creativity while the AI handles repetitive tasks.
| Feature | Description | Benefit |
|---|---|---|
| User Behavior Analysis | Analyzes how users interact with designs | Improves user experience |
| Design Suggestions | Generates ideas based on trends | Saves time and enhances creativity |
| Prototype Creation | Creates interactive models of designs | Facilitates user testing and feedback |
To begin, we need to create a prompt that instructs Gemini 3 to design a modern landing page for a pool hall named Sneaky Pets. The design should be in dark mode, featuring a pool table in the hero section. This section must include a headline, a subheadline, a primary call-to-action (CTA) button labeled Rates, and a secondary CTA button labeled Location. This setup will help us evaluate how well Gemini 3 can generate UI/UX designs.
After submitting the prompt to Antigravity, the initial output was disappointing. The design was far from appealing, lacking the aesthetic quality expected from a modern UI. It was described as ugly and horrendous, indicating that the generated design did not meet basic standards. Despite this, the functionality of the site was intact, suggesting that while the visual aspect was lacking, the underlying structure was operational.
Moving on to a more complex task, I uploaded a screencast of an existing website, portrait.so, to Gemini 3. The goal was to analyze the video and create a custom design for a Dropbox competitor. This involved breaking down the website into four sections and providing detailed prompts for each. The results were mixed; while some elements were captured, others were not accurately represented, such as the background gradient and the layout.
| Aspect | Initial Output | Expected Output |
|---|---|---|
| Visual Appeal | Ugly | Modern and Sleek |
| Functionality | Working | Working |
| Background Gradient | Missing | Present |
| Layout | Incorrect | Correct |
In conclusion, while Gemini 3 and Antigravity show potential for UI/UX design, they currently require significant refinement. Users should approach these tools with realistic expectations, understanding that design skills are still essential for achieving polished results.
When exploring the capabilities of Gemini 3 and Antigravity, it's essential to weigh the pros and cons of the designs they generate. On one hand, Gemini 3 offers advanced features that can create visually appealing layouts. However, the designs may sometimes lack polish and refinement. Antigravity, on the other hand, provides a unique user experience with its snapshot recording feature, but the actual design output can be disappointing.
User feedback is crucial in assessing the effectiveness of UI/UX designs. Many users have reported that while the functionality of the generated sites works well, the aesthetics often fall short. For instance, a landing page created for a pool hall was described as 'ugly' and 'butt ugly.' This highlights the need for designers to have a solid foundation in design principles, even when using advanced tools.
In terms of design quality, both Gemini 3 and Antigravity have their strengths and weaknesses. Gemini 3 can analyze existing designs and mimic them, but it may not always capture the finer details. Antigravity's unique features can enhance the user experience, yet the generated designs may require significant adjustments to meet professional standards. Ultimately, the quality of the output depends on the user's input and design skills.
| Feature | Gemini 3 | Antigravity |
|---|---|---|
| Visual Appeal | Moderate | Low |
| Functionality | High | High |
| User Experience | Average | Good |
| Design Refinement | Needs Improvement | Needs Improvement |
