EN

Turnitin 2025 Update: End of Rewriters & Humanizers? AI Detection Breakthrough

#AI Tools
2025-09-28 21:508 min read

Content Introduction

In this video, Dr. Nillesh Kumbar discusses a recent update from Turnitin relevant to students, researchers, and academics. He shares a case in which a student's original research paper displayed a surprising 26% AI score, despite being entirely written by the student without AI tools. Dr. Kumbar highlights the inaccuracies of AI detectors and mentions that scores under 30% are generally accepted by institutions. He then explains Turnitin's new update, which enhances its capability to detect AI-written texts, including those generated by AI bypassing tools. Demonstrating with examples, he explores various outputs—self-written, charged/generated, and humanized states to show how each scores within Turnitin. He reflects on the ethical implications of using these tools in academic writing and encourages viewers to subscribe for more insights and updates.

Key Information

  • Dr. Nillesh Kumbar discusses a recent update from Turnitin that every student, researcher, and academic should be aware of.
  • A student shared a case where he wrote an entire research paper with no AI tools, but when checked, Turnitin showed a 26% AI score.
  • The speaker explains that AI detectors often have a high degree of false positives, and generally, an AI score lower than 30% is acceptable for submissions in academia.
  • Many journals now reject papers with a higher AI score, leading to more scrutiny on how AI-generated content is presented.
  • The update from Turnitin includes enhanced capabilities to detect AI-generated text, even from tools designed to bypass plagiarism checks.
  • The speaker emphasizes the importance of using AI tools ethically and suggests that it is appropriate to use humanizing tools to improve writing without compromising academic integrity.
  • He warns that while using tools like stealth writers can yield good results, being overly reliant on AI can still produce text that is detectable as AI-generated.
  • Finally, he encourages users to check the AI score of their documents before submission to maintain the quality and integrity of their work.

Timeline Analysis

Content Keywords

Turnitin Update

Dr. Nillesh Kumbar discusses a crucial update from Turnitin that every student, researcher, and academic professional should be aware of. The video highlights the challenges of AI detector scores and the implications for academic submissions.

AI Detector Scores

The video explains how AI detector scores can present inaccuracies, with an example showing a research paper written without AI tools still receiving a 26% AI score. This leads to discussions about false positives in AI detection.

Research Paper Submission

The narrative covers a case where a student's paper faced rejection due to a notable AI score, emphasizing the need for scholars to check their AI scores before submitting research for publication.

Humanizer Tools

Dr. Kumbar recommends using humanizer tools to reduce AI scores, illustrating how a student successfully lowered their score from 26% to 0% using a tool called 'Stealth Writer'.

Chat GPT

Chat GPT is discussed as a tool for generating text and rewriting it, with insights on how its outputs can affect AI detector scores and recommendations on usage.

Implications for Academics

The video outlines the ethical dilemmas and considerations researchers face when using AI in their work and the importance of adhering to academic integrity.

Related questions&answers

Who is Dr. Nillesh Kumbar?

Dr. Nillesh Kumbar is the host of the video, and an academic professional knowledgeable about research and AI detection tools.

What important update from Turnitin is discussed in the video?

The video discusses the new Turnitin update that enhances AI writing detection capabilities, including the ability to detect texts generated by AI bypasser tools.

How did a student's research paper get flagged?

A student wrote a research paper in his own words without using AI tools, but when he checked the AI score, it showed 26%, indicating that the AI detector inaccurately flagged part of the original text.

What is the common acceptance rate for AI scores in academic submissions?

Generally, an AI score of less than 30% is accepted by most universities and journals.

What does the video suggest for reducing AI scores?

The video suggests using humanizers or tools designed to rephrase or rewrite text to reduce the AI score before submission.

What is the effectiveness of AI humanization tools according to the video?

AI humanization tools, like the stealth writer, are effective in reducing AI detection scores and producing text that resembles human writing.

What potential issue is raised regarding AI text generation?

The video raises concerns that even original human-written text can sometimes register a percentage of AI detection, leading to potential rejections in academic submissions.

What steps should be taken before submitting academic papers?

Before submitting academic papers, authors should check their documents in AI detection platforms like Turnitin to ensure compliance with institutional guidelines.

What does Dr. Nillesh Kumbar recommend at the end of the video?

Dr. Nillesh Kumbar encourages viewers to subscribe to his channel for more information and assistance regarding research and academic writing.

How can viewers contact Dr. Nillesh Kumbar for further inquiries?

Viewers can write comments under the video for any doubts or inquiries, and the host will try to address them.

More video recommendations

Share to: