EN

New Seedream 4.0 DESTROYS Nano Banana? AI Image Editor Comparison

#AI Tools
2025-09-19 19:578 min read

Content Introduction
Ask Questions

In this video, the host tests Google's new image generation model, Nanobanana, and compares it against top competitors, including Chat GPT and Flux Context Max, to evaluate its capabilities. The host highlights Nanobanana's strengths, such as character consistency and object replacement, showcasing various generated images throughout the tests. The video reviews the performance of each model in terms of prompt adherence, character consistency, and output quality, ultimately declaring Nanobanana the winner for its impressive results. The host also shares insights on the image generation process, emphasizing the importance of feedback and adjustments to achieve desired outcomes. Additionally, the audience is encouraged to sign up for the host's newsletter for more details on prompts and tools used.

Key Information

  • Photoshop may be in a tough spot after Google released a new image generation model called Nanobanana.
  • Nanobanana excels in character consistency, can replace objects in images, and shows a strong understanding of lighting and angles.
  • The speaker has tested Nanobanana extensively and will compare it with other top image generation models to evaluate its capabilities.
  • Tips for getting the best results with Nanobanana will also be shared in the video.
  • The speaker will generate the same image using different models to see which one performs best, using prompts and reference images.
  • While Nanobanana is free to use, it has limitations such as a watermark and a cap on the number of generations.
  • Open Art will be utilized for other generations as it allows for unlimited usage without watermarks.
  • Comparing the output from different AI models reveals varying levels of image quality, character consistency, and adherence to prompts.
  • The video includes tests focused on replacing objects in images and editing existing images using different models.
  • Final results and personal opinions on which models performed better in various tests are presented, highlighting Nanobanana as the clear winner overall.

Timeline Analysis

Content Keywords

Photoshop

Discussion on how Google's new image generation model may overshadow Photoshop's capabilities.

Nanobanana

A comparison of the Nanobanana model against other top image models, highlighting its strengths such as character consistency and ability to replace objects seamlessly.

image generation

Testing and generating images using various models to compare their outputs and effectiveness in producing desired results.

AI tools

Exploring different AI tools like Chat GPT and Flux Context to understand their capabilities in image generation and editing.

image editing

Using Open Art's Chat to edit feature for improving or altering existing images, with comparisons of results using different AI models.

Open Art

An all-in-one platform for generating, editing images, and creating videos using advanced AI tools.

AI comparison

Comparing performance of different AI models such as Nano Banana and Flux Context in generating images for various prompts.

visual results

Insights into the appearance and efficacy of images generated by different AI models and their adherence to prompts.

Related questions&answers

What image generation model is discussed in this video?

The video discusses the newly released Nano Banana image generation model.

What are the strengths of the Nano Banana model?

The strengths include near-perfect character consistency, the ability to replace any object with anything, and a deep understanding of lighting and angles.

How does the author compare different image generation models?

The author compares Nano Banana against other top image models to determine if it is ahead of its time, generating the same image across different models.

What tools are used by the author for generating images?

The author uses Nano Banana, Chat GPT, Cadream, and Flux Context Max.

What is a notable feature of Nano Banana?

Nano Banana can generate images quickly, however, it has some limitations like a watermark in the images.

How does the author evaluate the performance of the models?

The author looks at character consistency, prompt adherence, and the quality of the generated images.

Which model is determined to be the best overall?

Nano Banana is determined to be the clear winner, followed closely by Flux Context.

What challenges were encountered with multiple subjects in image generation?

The challenges include character consistency issues and variations in the results when there are multiple subjects.

What is the author's recommendation for those wanting to try these tools?

The author recommends signing up for Open Art to access various AI models and to receive the author's prompts and images used in the video.

More video recommendations

Share to: