I Tried the NEW Claude Code for Web (Honest Thoughts)

2025-10-23 10:5210 min read

The video discusses the recent launch of Cloud Code for Web, showcasing its capabilities for non-technical users to build and deploy applications without needing extensive coding experience. The presenter shares a firsthand experience, highlighting both the power and pitfalls of using Cloud Code compared to existing platforms like Bolt, emphasizing ease of use, real-time app interaction, and deployment options. The video illustrates how to effectively launch a flashcard app using Cloud Code and compares it with similar operations in Bolt, showcasing the differences in functionality and user experience. Throughout, there is a focus on making app development accessible to everyone, regardless of technical skills, while addressing the limitations of Cloud Code in real-time interactions and app visibility.

Key Information

  • Cloud Code for web enables direct integration into web apps, being hailed as the future of coding.
  • The video demonstrates both the advantages and shortcomings of using Cloud Code compared to traditional coding platforms like Bolt.
  • Cloud Code is designed to provide a user-friendly interface for non-technical users, allowing them to build applications with minimal coding experience.
  • A key limitation mentioned is the lack of immediate app preview capabilities in Cloud Code, unlike platforms such as Bolt where users can launch and interact with their applications seamlessly.
  • The user experience when using Cloud Code is less straightforward compared to the more integrated and intuitive approach provided by Bolt.
  • Despite Cloud Code's potential, it primarily caters to technical users who are comfortable navigating repositories and coding, which may be overwhelming for non-technical users.
  • The video concludes by recommending Bolt for its simpler interface and integration compared to the newer Cloud Code.

Timeline Analysis

Content Keywords

Cloud Code

Cloud Code for web recently launched, allowing users to directly use Cloud Code in their web applications. This coding method is perceived as a powerful tool for creating real apps without the need for traditional coding tools like terminals.

Testing Cloud Code

The testing of Cloud Code reveals several limitations, particularly when launching or previewing applications, leading to potential frustration for users. The video aims to outline alternatives to the issues found.

Alternatives

The video discusses alternative platforms for non-technical users to build fully functioning applications, such as Bolt and Lovable, which allow for app development through simple text prompts.

Developer Tools

The script highlights the user interface of Cloud Code as simple and chat-based, contrasting it with traditional coding environments. It discusses how AI-assisted platforms enable easier app development.

Comparison between Bolt and Claude Code

The video compares the functionalities of Bolt and Claude Code, highlighting advantages such as ease of use, the ability to see real-time application builds, and the complexity of integration required with GitHub for Claude Code.

Non-technical users

The focus is on non-technical users who struggle with complex coding environments, emphasizing how tools like Bolt enable them to build applications without deep programming knowledge.

Publishing and Sharing Apps

The script mentions the simplicity of publishing apps through platforms like Bolt, allowing for instant sharing, a feature that is more complex in Cloud Code.

Final Thoughts

The speaker concludes by reinforcing the value of Bolt's integrated features compared to Cloud Code, especially for non-technical users seeking a more approachable way to build applications.

More video recommendations

Share to: