Private Proxy Wingate.me markets itself as a provider of dedicated IPv4/SOCKS5 proxies, claiming a pool of 12,000–15,000 IPs across Russia, Ukraine, the US, Germany, and other European regions. These proxies rotate every 15 minutes and are promoted for anonymity, torrenting, automation, and bypassing geo-restrictions. Unlike traditional VPNs or residential proxies, Wingate.me focuses exclusively on SOCKS protocols—ignoring HTTP/HTTPS, mobile, or datacenter proxies.
However, Wingate.me is not a software tool (like Wingate.com’s proxy server suite) but a standalone proxy reselling service. Its setup requires minimal configuration: users register, select a plan, and receive credentials (IP/port/authentication details) for manual integration with browsers or tools.
Pros:
Cons:
❌ Expired HTTPS certificates on critical subdomains (e.g., cabinet.wingate.me), exposing data to interception
❌ Zero privacy policy, violating GDPR/CCPA compliance requirements
❌ Registration emails never arrive, indicating broken verification and support
❌ No WHOIS data or company details, making ownership untraceable
❌ Defunct social media links (Twitter, Facebook) and no user reviews
Key Risk: Wingate.me’s operational opacity and security flaws pose severe privacy threats—avoid if handling sensitive data or business operations.
Wingate.me’s plans cater to short-term users but lack scalability:
Plan | Price | IP Range | Duration |
Monthly Combo | $170 | 12,000–15,000 IPs | 1 month |
Weekly Deal | $60 | 12,000–15,000 IPs | 1 week |
Daily Access | $12 | Full IP pool | 24 hours |
Heavy User Monthly | $600 | ~30,000 IPs | 1 month |
Limitations:
For secure, large-scale operations, DICloak’s antidetect browser combined with premium proxies (e.g., PIA S5) outperforms Wingate.me in every aspect:
Wingate.me’s expired certificates, absent policies, and broken infrastructure make it dangerous for professional use. For anonymity-critical tasks—multi-account management, e-commerce, or ads—choose DICloak instead. It delivers:
👉 Take Action:
Its service is legal, but its lack of compliance (e.g., no GDPR policy) risks user liability.
No—its SOCKS-only proxies lack HTTP support, triggering instant flags on Meta platforms.