EN
It is more and more important to learn English as a second language in the modern globalized world. Fluency in English means getting more career opportunities and chances of getting an education, as well as having access to communicate with other people and media of other cultures. Therefore, the English learning industry has been booming over the last few years. The world market of language learning reached a value of 61.5 billion dollars in 2023 alone, and it is predicted to reach more than 350 billion dollars by the year 2032.
The technology has become central in the way people learn English in this growing industry. Learning apps offer convenient and mobile methods of enhancing the skills of learners. Even adaptive and personalized training is provided with the help of English AI tutors. Nevertheless, the questions of data privacy, equal opportunity to technology, and the possibility of apps to substitute human teaching are still raised.
This paper compares the main distinctions between AI tutoring apps and conventional language study apps. It evaluates both the advantages and shortcomings that each one of them has, including customization and cost. When contrasting such key aspects as speech recognition, feedback, and gamification elements, the readers will be able to conclude which of the options can be safer and more efficient in terms of various groups of English learners in 2025.
One major distinction is the level of personalization. AI tutoring apps like Duolingo ABC and ELSA Speak use machine learning algorithms to tailor lessons to each learner’s strengths and weaknesses. As users answer questions and speak into the app, the technology studies their errors and patterns. It then provides customized feedback and content catered to improving the unique issues that the learner struggles with.
Traditional apps are those with predetermined lesson plans and activities that fail to respond to each one. Such well-known services as Busuu and Rosetta Stone offer standardized content to the users. Although this is still capable of guiding language acquisition, it does not have the dynamic personalization of AI to focus on areas of the learner that are deficient or lacking in pronunciation skills.
On the same note, the nature of the feedback offered distinguishes the two categories of apps. AI-powered applications are no longer limited to detecting errors in the work of the learner, but can give a detailed explanation of the incorrectness and suggestions due to data analysis and speech recognition.
For example, the speech analysis feature in ELSA Speak gives feedback on pronunciation at the vowel, consonant, and syllable levels. It catches subtle issues like mispronounced words or improperly intonated sentences. Apps without AI cannot offer such detailed and personalized feedback. They provide general answers about whether activities are completed correctly or not.
Gamification, which incorporates game elements into learning, is increasingly utilized in both AI and traditional apps to boost student motivation and engagement. Duolingo has long been known for its fun interface and use of points, levels, streaks, and rewards to addict users to learning.
However, AI apps have the advantage of adapting their gamified content to each learner, too. If a student is struggling with vocabulary, the app may incorporate more games focused on memorizing words than grammar for that individual. Traditional apps cannot customize activities in this manner to incentivize users. Their gamification approach remains uniform.
While both categories leverage interactivity and entertainment to make studying more enjoyable, AI tutor apps can gamify lessons to target student weaknesses and stay motivating.
Pricing differs substantially between the two categories. Most AI-based learning apps cost significantly more because they utilize complex technology and need extensive research and development. Prices commonly range from $100 to $400 annually.
Traditional apps tend to be cheaper, with many, like Duolingo, remaining completely free. Others cost up to $120 annually for advanced features and offline access. While AI apps can offer more personalised instruction, their premium pricing poses a barrier for many learners.
Accessibility also varies greatly. Apps without sophisticated AI can function on basic smartphones and tablets without issue. But because they process speech and complex machine learning algorithms, AI tutor apps require relatively recent devices and operating systems. Many are also only available or optimized for iOS and not Android. This affects accessibility for those with older or non-Apple smartphones.
Traditional language apps stand a better chance of being free or low-cost and compatible with any device, which eventually allows more students around the world access to English learning.
Since functionality in AI apps uses user data, there are questions of possible privacy issues that conventional alternatives do not have. The learners submit much personal information to the app by submitting speech samples and answering lengthy questions, including highly sensitive biometrics such as voice data.
Although AI English tutors usually guarantee the protection and encryption of data, the risks related to possible hacking or abuse remain. The leakage of the spoken sentences or history of conversations can be a threat to the financial, medical, or identity security of a learner. Conventional apps collect less voluminous data that is concentrated on the improvements, but not personal characteristics.
As long as more stringent policies on the use of biometric data are not established, some learners, albeit technologically enabled, might steer clear of the copious amounts of personal data that AI applications need to operate.
Apps are also considered an alternative to human English teaching. However, traditional options only give elementary feedback, whereas AI tutors are able to give more detailed feedback; both lack significant teacher interaction. The skepticism that technology will never be able to match human judgment and emotional intelligence is, therefore, still in existence.
In contrast to apps, human teachers develop rapport with the students, and they know not only their academic skills but also their attitudes, motivations, and peculiarities. They employ this sympathy to advocate differentiated learning. English classes are also a community builder, and conversation practice is possible. Applications cannot replace such emotional and social learning.
Even with the high level of personalization, AI English tutors cannot match the refined teaching and assistance provided by human teachers. The learners would be better off using them as an additional tool alongside conventional classroom learning, in case they were available.
Lastly, although AI is intended to offer adaptive tutoring, it might ultimately be ineffective since the quality of its algorithm and dataset is variable. English learning applications, as any other form of AI, are subject to repeating discriminatory biases against certain groups.
For example, speech recognition software still tends to have higher error rates for women and minority accents. Making mistakes in their speech could be hindered and thwarted by false positives that would identify them as wrong. The inaccuracies and unfairness of the AI can be compromised by the flaws in the data and programming it is based.
Moreover, the majority of AI tutoring applications are also vocabulary, grammar, and pronunciation-oriented. Although these fundamental skills are necessary, human teachers also inculcate holistic communicative skills such as conversational skills, writing fluency, as well as cultural awareness. This broad-based and student-centered approach can not be completely replaced with applications.
That is why, in the context of using AI apps to teach English personally, there is still a high chance of facing certain limitations regarding data biases and the extent of the learning process, meaning that this technology might still require some care and additional human instruction.
Nevertheless, English tutoring apps with artificial intelligence are estimated to further improve their capacity and gain popularity in 2025. The rising power of computing and the presence of training data will make algorithms more precise in processing speech, identifying errors, and making teaching more efficient for students.
5 key developments in AI apps expected in 2025 include:
This technological advancement may render the AI tutor apps more helpful in terms of teaching the finer points of the English language and reaching a broader audience across the world. Apps can be closer to learning that is personal and fair.
However, human teachers, emotional support, and communicative classroom activities will not lose their relevance to balanced English proficiency. AI apps have a higher probability of acting as an assistant and should be combined with traditional instruction. Artificial intelligence and classroom learning can reinforce each other instead of competing with each other when used with a balanced approach.
According to the aforementioned comparative analysis, what are the best types of apps that can be used for various English learning needs and circumstances? These are the suggestions:
Taking into consideration their level of understanding, age, financial limitations, and learning priorities, the English students will be able to integrate both conventional and AI-enhanced applications strategically in order to achieve maximum results.
Apps are becoming very important in the learning of the English language, and they can be made portable, interactive, and customized. But there are certain pros and cons of AI tutor applications when compared to traditional applications that do not use machine learning.
The AI applications deliver unrivaled personalized feedback, gamification, and speech analysis to address the weak areas of every learner. There are, however, limits as to bias, privacy, access, and replacement of human teachers. Less costly traditional apps have no dangers of high data consumption and can develop the basics with the help of stimulating activities.
In the future, AI tutoring will have more and more functionality to increase accuracy and abilities. However, something like a balance is necessary. Both old and new AI-powered learning programs complement each other instead of competing. With prudent use, apps, when applied in conjunction with classroom teaching, can improve the instruction of learners at any level to harness the advantages of technology and contain its possible drawbacks.