EN
The landscape of AI models is rapidly evolving, with new versions like Cool 4.1, 03, 04 Mini, and 04 Mini High emerging alongside OpenAI's codecs. This article explores the capabilities of these models, particularly focusing on their performance in creating Python games using reinforcement learning.
The challenge begins with the task of developing an autonomous snake game. The objective is to create a game where two snakes battle each other, with a scoreboard that tracks their scores based on survival time and fruit consumption. Each model, including Claude 3.7 Sonnet, Gemini 2.5 Pro, and others, is tasked with this prompt to assess their coding capabilities.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet successfully creates the snake game with clear graphics and a functioning scoreboard. The score increments correctly, reflecting the game mechanics. However, it encounters a type error that causes a crash, which raises concerns about its stability despite its impressive initial performance.
Gemini 2.5 Pro demonstrates strong performance, effectively implementing the game mechanics without major flaws. The model avoids a grid system, allowing for smooth movement, and includes a summary of scores at the end of each round, showcasing its ability to meet the prompt requirements.
The 04 Mini High model opts for a grid design, which works well but leads to frequent collisions between snakes. In contrast, the 04 Mini model is simpler but effective, with clear score visibility. Both models, while functional, exhibit issues with snake collisions that affect gameplay.
The 03 model stands out for its ability to prevent snake collisions, showcasing a more refined approach to game mechanics compared to the Mini models. However, it lacks clarity in player identification, which could confuse new users. Overall, it performs admirably in the snake game challenge.
To increase the challenge, the same prompt is modified to include reinforcement learning capabilities. The models are tasked with creating a training pipeline that allows the snakes to learn from their gameplay over multiple episodes, enhancing their performance through experience.
The 04 Mini model initially shows promise but fails to execute the training script. The 04 Mini High encounters similar issues, while the 03 model manages to run successfully. Gemini 2.5 Pro crashes during execution, but Claude 3.7 Sonnet excels, demonstrating effective training and gameplay mechanics.
After training, the performance of the neural network-trained snake is compared to the original Python script. Surprisingly, the trained snake outperforms the scripted version, indicating that reinforcement learning can significantly enhance gameplay effectiveness.
The exploration continues with the creation of a 2D solar system simulator and an autonomous soccer game. Each model is tested on its ability to implement complex mechanics such as gravitational pulls and player stats, revealing varying degrees of success across the models.
The testing of these AI models in game development highlights their potential and limitations. While some models excel in creating functional games, others struggle with execution and stability. Future iterations of these models may benefit from improved algorithms and error handling to enhance their capabilities in game design.
Q: What are the new AI models mentioned in the article?
A: The new AI models include Cool 4.1, 03, 04 Mini, and 04 Mini High, alongside OpenAI's codecs.
Q: What is the objective of the autonomous snake game?
A: The objective is to create a game where two snakes battle each other, with a scoreboard tracking their scores based on survival time and fruit consumption.
Q: What issues did Claude 3.7 Sonnet face while creating the snake game?
A: Claude 3.7 Sonnet encountered a type error that caused a crash, raising concerns about its stability despite its impressive initial performance.
Q: How did Gemini 2.5 Pro perform in the snake game challenge?
A: Gemini 2.5 Pro demonstrated strong performance, effectively implementing the game mechanics without major flaws and including a summary of scores at the end of each round.
Q: What are the differences between the 04 Mini and 04 Mini High models?
A: The 04 Mini High model uses a grid design leading to frequent collisions, while the 04 Mini model is simpler but effective with clear score visibility.
Q: What unique feature does the 03 model offer?
A: The 03 model stands out for its ability to prevent snake collisions, showcasing a more refined approach to game mechanics.
Q: How does reinforcement learning enhance the snake game?
A: Reinforcement learning allows the snakes to learn from their gameplay over multiple episodes, enhancing their performance through experience.
Q: Which model excelled in executing the training script for reinforcement learning?
A: Claude 3.7 Sonnet excelled in demonstrating effective training and gameplay mechanics.
Q: What was the outcome of comparing neural networks to Python scripts?
A: The trained snake outperformed the original Python script, indicating that reinforcement learning can significantly enhance gameplay effectiveness.
Q: What additional game concepts were explored?
A: The exploration included creating a 2D solar system simulator and an autonomous soccer game, testing each model's ability to implement complex mechanics.
Q: What are the conclusions drawn from testing these AI models?
A: The testing highlights the potential and limitations of the models, with some excelling in creating functional games while others struggle with execution and stability.