EN
Deep Seek V3 has emerged as a notable contender in the landscape of large language models (LLMs), especially when compared to established giants like GPT and Claude. After a week of usage, it is evident that Deep Seek V3 holds its ground among the top LLMs, as reflected in various comparison platforms such as the Chatbot Arena LLM leaderboard.
In the Chatbot Arena LLM leaderboard, Deep Seek V3 ranks within the top 10, despite lacking a proprietary license. This open-source model, while powerful, is not easily runnable on standard personal machines due to its size. A comparison between GPT-4 and Deep Seek V3 reveals that both models have similar input context windows, but GPT-4 offers double the maximum output tokens. Notably, GPT-4 is not open-source, while Deep Seek V3 is.
The knowledge cutoff for GPT-4 is set at October 2023, whereas Deep Seek V3 claims a knowledge cutoff of July 2024, which, if accurate, positions it closely to Claude's cutoff date. This aspect is crucial for users seeking the most current information from their LLMs.
Deep Seek V3 offers a competitive pricing model, charging 14 cents for input tokens compared to GPT-4's 2.5 dollars. For output tokens, the cost is 28 cents for Deep Seek V3 versus 10 dollars for GPT-4. However, it is important to note that these prices are promotional and will increase by February 2025, making it essential for users to consider long-term costs.
When evaluating performance benchmarks, Deep Seek V3 shows impressive results, achieving 88.5 in massive multitasking language understanding, closely trailing GPT-4's score of 88.7. In more challenging tests, Deep Seek V3 outperformed GPT-4 with a score of 75.9 compared to GPT-4's 74.68. However, in coding evaluations, GPT-4 leads with a higher score, indicating its strength in code generation.
When comparing Deep Seek V3 with Claude 3.5, the differences in pricing and performance become evident. Claude 3.5 is significantly more expensive, with input token costs approximately 20 times higher. In terms of performance metrics, Claude outperforms Deep Seek in various categories, including math and encoding tasks.
User experiences with Deep Seek V3 reveal its strengths in front-end development, particularly due to its updated knowledge base. In practical tests, Deep Seek provided more relevant code compared to GPT-4, which sometimes suggested outdated methods. Claude, however, consistently delivered superior code quality, showcasing its advanced capabilities.
While Claude currently stands out as the top performer among LLMs, Deep Seek V3 offers a compelling alternative, especially for users mindful of budget constraints. Future testing could explore the capabilities of other models like Gemini, which has shown promising results in the Chatbot Arena. As the landscape of LLMs continues to evolve, users will benefit from ongoing comparisons and evaluations.
Q: What is Deep Seek V3?
A: Deep Seek V3 is a large language model (LLM) that has emerged as a notable contender in the landscape of LLMs, ranking within the top 10 on platforms like the Chatbot Arena LLM leaderboard.
Q: How does Deep Seek V3 compare to GPT-4?
A: Both Deep Seek V3 and GPT-4 have similar input context windows, but GPT-4 offers double the maximum output tokens. Additionally, GPT-4 is not open-source, while Deep Seek V3 is.
Q: What are the knowledge cutoff dates for Deep Seek V3 and GPT-4?
A: The knowledge cutoff for GPT-4 is October 2023, while Deep Seek V3 claims a knowledge cutoff of July 2024.
Q: What is the pricing structure for Deep Seek V3?
A: Deep Seek V3 charges 14 cents for input tokens and 28 cents for output tokens, compared to GPT-4's 2.5 dollars for input tokens and 10 dollars for output tokens. These prices are promotional and will increase by February 2025.
Q: How does Deep Seek V3 perform in benchmarking tests?
A: Deep Seek V3 achieved a score of 88.5 in massive multitasking language understanding, closely trailing GPT-4's score of 88.7. In more challenging tests, Deep Seek V3 outperformed GPT-4 with a score of 75.9.
Q: How does Deep Seek V3 compare to Claude 3.5?
A: Claude 3.5 is significantly more expensive, with input token costs approximately 20 times higher than Deep Seek V3. Claude outperforms Deep Seek in various performance metrics, including math and encoding tasks.
Q: What is the user experience like with Deep Seek V3?
A: Users have reported that Deep Seek V3 excels in front-end development, providing more relevant code than GPT-4, which sometimes suggests outdated methods. However, Claude consistently delivers superior code quality.
Q: What does the future hold for Deep Seek V3 and LLMs?
A: While Claude currently stands out as the top performer, Deep Seek V3 offers a compelling alternative for budget-conscious users. Future testing may explore other models like Gemini, which have shown promising results.