EN

Is ChatGPT 4o Really Better Than GPT-5?

#AI Tools
2025-12-09 22:169 min read

Content Introduction
Ask Questions

The video explores the performance comparison between three AI models: Chat GPT 403, Chat GPT 5, and Google Gemini 2.5 Pro. The presenter conducts experiments to evaluate their responses to the same prompts, employing AI for unbiased results. Initial findings show that Model C (Google Gemini) outperformed others in multiple categories, while Model A (Chat GPT 5) demonstrated stronger performance in intelligence and reasoning despite overall ranking last. A second evaluation produced slightly different results but reaffirmed Model C's superiority in most areas. The video highlights that while GPT 5 is a notable improvement over older models, independent evaluations suggest nuanced strengths in different categories, urging users to reconsider its potential. Overall, the findings advocate for GPT 5's relevance, especially for content creators.

Key Information

  • There has been significant discontent regarding the launch of GPT-5, with many claiming it performs worse than prior models.
  • An experiment was conducted comparing the responses of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-5, and Claude Opus 41 using the same prompts for evaluation.
  • AI was utilized for unbiased assessment of the models' responses instead of subjective human rating.
  • The experiment involved two trials to gather consistent insights and ensure accuracy of findings.
  • The evaluation system had clear criteria focusing on response quality, intelligence, creativity, and technical competence.
  • In the first round of testing, Model C (presumed to be GPT-5) outperformed both Model A and Model B.
  • Despite some overlapping performance between models, Model A showed stronger performance in the intelligence category than Model B.
  • Additional tests revealed mixed results for Model A and Model B's performance in communication and clarity.
  • Though GPT-5 was found to excel in certain aspects, it faced competition from Claude and Gemini in others.
  • The overall findings suggested that while GPT-5 is a strong model, it may not be the definitive best among the newer AI models.

Timeline Analysis

Content Keywords

GPT5 Launch

Since the launch of GPT5, there have been complaints about its performance being worse than older models. An experiment was conducted to test GPT5 against both GPT-403 and Chat GPT5 using the same prompts.

AI Evaluation Experiment

The experiment involved comparing responses from different AI models (GPT-403, GPT5, Claude 41, and Gemini 2.5 Pro) using a detailed evaluation system, including performance metrics across several categories.

AI Model Comparison

The comparison of AI models highlighted that Model C consistently outperformed others across most categories, except for communication clarity where Model B excelled.

AI Performance Scores

Scores were assigned to each model based on various criteria, with Model C receiving the highest overall score followed by Model B and Model A, suggesting significant strengths and weaknesses within the AI models.

AI Findings

Findings indicated that while GPT5 had improved capabilities, there were still some areas, particularly in communication and originality, where previous models performed better.

User Perspective

The video emphasizes user perceptions, suggesting that while power users can identify better features in GPT5, it’s crucial to recognize performance differences in specific categories.

Content Creation Recommendations

Recommendations were made for content creators on using AI tools effectively to enhance productivity and quality in their projects, reinforcing the value of ongoing experimentation with AI models.

Related questions&answers

What are some common complaints about GPT-5 since its launch?

Many users have complained that GPT-5 is worse than the older models.

What experiment was conducted to compare GPT models?

The experiment involved testing chat GPT-403 and chat GPT-5 with the same 10 prompts to compare their responses.

How were the responses from GPT models rated?

Instead of manually rating them, AI was used to evaluate and rate the responses to eliminate bias.

What was the outcome of the comparison between models?

Model C consistently outperformed Model B and Model A across various categories.

What factors were considered in the evaluation of the GPT models?

Factors included response quality, intelligence, communication and clarity, creativity and originality, and technical competence.

Which model was found to be the best overall?

Model C was determined to be the best overall, followed by Model B and Model A.

Did the evaluations from different AIs agree on the rankings of the models?

While the evaluations generally aligned, there were some differences in ranking between the models based on their specialties.

Why is it suggested to give GPT-5 thinking a second chance?

It is suggested to give GPT-5 a second chance because it shows potential in providing faster and higher quality output for content creators.

What is the significance of the scores provided by the different AI models?

The scores from different AI models provide insights into the comparative effectiveness and capabilities of the models in various performance categories.

What should users do if they found value in the video?

Users should like the video, subscribe to the channel, and engage with the content.

More video recommendations

Share to: