EN

The $3 A Month AI Model That Outperforms Claude Sonnet 4

#AI Tools
2025-09-16 13:058 min read

Content Introduction
Ask Questions

The video compares two AI models, GLM 4.5 by ZAI and Claude Sonet 4, by evaluating their performance on coding tasks. GLM 4.5 is highlighted for its impressive benchmarks and affordability, being significantly cheaper than its competitor. The video demonstrates each model's capabilities through a series of coding tasks, ranging from simple website creation to more complex implementations. Overall, GLM 4.5 showcases commendable speed and cost-effectiveness, while Claude Sonet 4 offers insights into debugging and enhanced user experience in interfaces. Despite some performance discrepancies, Claude is acknowledged for its superior presentation. The creator concludes with an endorsement of GLM for those seeking a cost-efficient solution with solid performance.

Key Information

  • GLM 4.5 by ZAI is a leading Chinese AI model, noted for impressive benchmarks.
  • The GLM coding plan is significantly cheaper and offers more usage compared to competitors like Claw Pro.
  • Tests conducted on GLM and Anthropic models involved tasks of varying difficulty to determine performance.
  • GLM 4.5 is affordable at approximately $3 per month, but has limitations like not being multimodal.
  • In tasks involving portfolio website creation, GLM was able to produce results quickly and at a low cost.
  • A comparison of coding plans showed Claude Sonet 4 performing slightly better in user-friendly features, despite GLM having a fast output.
  • The final task involved creating a Minecraft clone using 3JS, with GLM producing results quicker than Claude.

Timeline Analysis

Content Keywords

GLM 4.5

GLM 4.5 by ZAI is a prominent Chinese AI model known for its impressive benchmarks. It is about seven times cheaper than its competitors like Claw Pro, offering three times more usage. The model incorporates advanced features, including reasoning capabilities and a 128k context window.

Coding Plan

The GLM coding plan competes directly with Anthropic and offers significant cost savings along with robust performance for coding tasks. The plan emphasizes usability for developers transitioning from other platforms.

Claude Sonet 4

Claude Sonet 4 is another AI model that performs comparably, if not better, than GLM 4.5 in some areas. It is noted for having a more visually appealing interface and offers detailed debugging capabilities. However, it has slower performance in specific tasks.

Minecraft Clone

The video demonstrates the attempt to create a Minecraft clone using both GLM 4.5 and Claude, highlighting significant efficiency differences in execution time and end results. Both models show capabilities in handling various tasks, though GLM 4.5 is recognized for being faster and more cost-effective.

AI Model Comparison

The video compares GLM 4.5 and Claude Sonet 4 in various coding tasks, illustrating their strengths and weaknesses across different applications, including web development and game design.

Task Performance

Key highlights include both models' performances in specific tasks, with GLM 4.5 showcasing faster execution and lower costs, while Claude Sonet 4 excels in user experience with advanced debugging.

AI Modeling Cost

Overall, GLM 4.5 is deemed a favorable model for developers seeking cost-effective solutions with robust functionalities. The assessment emphasizes the importance of features like API-based pricing and the potential for further enhancements through additional prompts.

Related questions&answers

What is GLM?

GLM is a Chinese AI model known for its impressive capabilities and benchmarks.

How does GLM compare in cost to other models?

GLM is approximately 20 times cheaper than Claw Pro and provides three times more usage.

What features does the GLM coding plan include?

The GLM coding plan includes features like multi-model usage, support for dark mode, and static contact forms.

Can GLM effectively create a personal portfolio website?

Yes, GLM was able to build a personal portfolio website using HTML, CSS, and JavaScript successfully.

How does the performance of GLM 4.5 compare to Claude Sonet?

GLM 4.5 performed slightly better than Claude Sonet 4, with faster completion times for tasks.

Is GLM capable of handling complex tasks like creating a Minecraft clone?

Yes, GLM has been able to create a Minecraft clone using 3JS, but additional tasks such as collision detection may have issues.

What is one downside of using GLM?

One downside is that GLM is not multimodal and struggles with reading images.

How did GLM perform in creating a Hacker News clone?

GLM completed the Hacker News clone in half the time compared to Claude and at half the cost.

What was the overall impression of the GLM model?

The GLM model is considered impressive for its low cost and functionality, making it a good option for users.

What tasks are GLM models specifically used for?

GLM models are used for tasks including coding, building websites, and implementing advanced features like infinite scrolling.

More video recommendations

Share to: