Content Introduction
In this video, the presenter discusses the latest updates on the AI model Kimik, highlighting its enhanced capabilities, which now include 262,000 context tokens, significantly improving performance on coding and agentic tasks compared to its previous version. It will cost $0.60 per million input tokens and $250 per million output tokens. The performance is contrasted with other models like Claude 4, which offers lower costs for token usage but with slightly lesser functionality. The video showcases the process of creating a Ruby cube simulator using 3.js and evaluating the model's performance in real-time, revealing mixed results and performance issues, especially in terms of animation and task execution. The presenter reflects on the superiority of various models and ends by inviting viewers to engage with questions and comments.Key Information
- Kimik has been updated, increasing its context from 128,000 to 262,000.
- The new version provides improved performance for coding and agentic tasks.
- Kimik now costs $0.60 per million input tokens and $250 per million output tokens.
- It competes with other models like Claude 3 and GLM 4.5, which have different pricing and context capabilities.
- The speaker plans to test Kimik 2’s performance by creating a Ruby cube simulator project using 3.js.
- The speaker found that Kimik 2's initial attempts at creating the simulator did not meet expectations, particularly in terms of animations and visual output.
- After failing the first test, the speaker encouraged testing Kilo code's capabilities and how it integrates with Kimik 2.
- The performance can depend on both Kilo code and Kimik.
- The speaker's experience with Claude 4 shows more advanced capabilities, including direct testing capability within the client's browser.
Timeline Analysis
Content Keywords
Kimik Update
Kimik has received an update, increasing its context capacity from 128,000 to 262,000, leading to significant improvements in coding performance and agentic tasks. This version costs $0.60 per million input tokens and $250 for output tokens.
Kimik vs. Claude Model
The speaker compares Kimik with Claude models, noting that the new Kimik model could challenge Claude 3 and claims it offers better performance, although pricing is higher compared to other models.
Performance Comparison
The speaker mentions not comparing Kimik's performance against Claude 4 or other models directly, citing differences in context capacity and cost-effectiveness.
Coding Task Evaluation
The video showcases a Ruby cube simulator project, prompting the viewer to understand how well Kimik 2 performs coding tasks compared to previous versions and other AI models.
Kilo Code Installation
Instructions for setting up Kilo code in a coding environment are provided, emphasizing its ease of integration with various AI providers and capabilities for testing code.
AI Model Testing
Details on testing the performance of different AI models, including Kimik and Claude, are presented, highlighting issues and successes with various coding tasks.
3D Rubik's Cube Simulator
The video discusses the development and testing of a 3D Rubik's cube simulator project using the Kimik model, focusing on the functionality of solving and scrambling features.
Game Simulation
Demonstrates how the AI systems handle tasks such as creating a chess game, evaluating performance based on code output and user interaction.
Error Handling
The speaker addresses various errors encountered while executing AI tasks and discusses potential solutions and troubleshooting strategies.
Kimik vs. Claude Sonet 4
The speaker expresses their opinion that Claude Sonet 4 is superior in certain aspects, highlighting differences in performance capabilities and task handling.
Related questions&answers
What is the new context size of Kimik?
How does the performance of the new model compare to the previous one?
What are the costs associated with Kimik?
How does Kimik's pricing compare to other models?
Can Kimik accept images?
What is the main focus of the tasks being performed in the video?
What issues did the Kimik model encounter during testing?
What are some of the key differences between Kimik and other models?
What was the first coding task attempted?
How does Kimik prioritize tasks versus other models?
More video recommendations
MusicGPT vs Suno vs AIVA vs Soundraw – 2025 | I Made the Same Song in 4 Different AI Music Tools
#AI Tools2025-09-28 20:24Go High Level Honest Review in 2025: Is it Worth it for SMM?
#Digital marketing2025-09-28 20:192 airdrop updats: plaza finance airdrop about to Shutdown - How to cashout now | Grass airdrop claim
#Airdrop Farming2025-09-28 20:18Monad airdrop update: Connecting X(Twitter) account to discord | Do this (urgent)
#Airdrop Farming2025-09-28 20:16WOW! NEW AI Agent Beats ChatGPT 5 with Starting a ONE PERSON BUSINESS?
#Make money2025-09-28 20:15DO THIS To Make The YouTube Algorithm LOVE YOU in 2025 (new settings)
#Social Media Marketing2025-09-28 20:104 Ways To Target Your Ideal Audience In 2025 With Facebook Ads
#Online Advertising2025-09-28 20:09🚨 SUI Crypto Airdrops + Monad & Ethena Crypto News 🚨
#Cryptocurrency2025-09-28 20:06