EN

Can This FREE China AI Beat $200/Month Claude Code?

#AI Tools
2025-09-02 17:168 min read

Content Introduction

The video discusses the current landscape of AI models, specifically contrasting those from China with leading models like Claude and Opus. It highlights that while other countries, like the U.S., focus on major AI advancements, Chinese models such as Kim K2 and Quen 3 are not only cheaper (often by over 90%) but also competitive in performance. The presenter, Rob, who has a background in coding, aims to test and compare these models in a coding challenge. Throughout the video, he conducts real-time tests, measuring effectiveness and speed, ultimately noting that Kim K2 Instruct significantly outperforms Quen 3, while also considering factors like cost-effectiveness. Rob concludes that despite some limitations, these emerging models from China are becoming increasingly viable alternatives to their more established counterparts.

Key Information

  • The video discusses AI competition between models from China and leading American models, stating that Chinese models are cheaper and, in some instances, outperform the American competitors.
  • Key models competing include 'Kim K2' from Moonshot AI and 'Quen 3 Coder' from Alibaba, which are noted for their affordability and performance.
  • The speaker, an experienced coder named Rob, highlights that he has been teaching people how to leverage AI in coding projects, making it accessible even to non-technical individuals.
  • The performance comparison shows that while 'Kim K2' creates a fully functional AI chatbot in 2 minutes and 20 seconds, 'Quen 3 Coder' struggles with slower performance.
  • In terms of cost, 'Kim K2' proved to be very economical while achieving tasks efficiently, whereas 'Quen 3' not only took longer but also showed limitations in context remembrance.
  • Overall, the video suggests that while the Chinese models show promise and competitive pricing, there is still a gap in performance compared to established American models.

Timeline Analysis

Content Keywords

Chinese AI Models

The video discusses the competitive landscape of AI models developed in China, emphasizing that these models are often cheaper and in some cases can outperform American models, like Claude. The video also explores specific models, such as Kim K2 and Quen 3 Coder, comparing their performance and costs against their American counterparts.

AI Cost Comparison

A comparison is made between the costs of various AI models, highlighting that certain Chinese models are significantly cheaper, even offering free options, while American models like Claude and Opus are often much more expensive.

Open Source AI

The discussion includes the relevance and potential of open-source AI models, particularly from China, which are becoming increasingly popular and provide affordable alternatives to more expensive closed-source options.

Model Performance

The video evaluates the performance of AI models in real-time scenarios, noting differences in responsiveness and effectiveness between Kim K2 and Quen 3 Coder, particularly in building applications and handling tasks.

Rob's AI Blueprint

Rob, the presenter, shares insights into teaching individuals, especially non-technical founders, to use AI tools effectively, and promotes his AI coding blueprint available in the description for further learning.

Live Testing and Results

The content demonstrates live testing of the AI models in real conditions, monitoring their performance over time, and documenting challenges faced, including speed and effectiveness of task completion.

Related questions&answers

What are the two big AI models mentioned in the video?

The two big models competing right now are Kim K2 from Moonshot AI and Quen 3 Coder from Alibaba.

How much cheaper are the Chinese AI models compared to Claude and Opus?

The Chinese AI models are often cheaper by over 90% or being free entirely.

What did the speaker claim about the performance of the Chinese models compared to American models?

The speaker claimed that in some cases, the new AI models from China supposedly even outperform the American competition.

What was the time taken by Claude to build the ChatGPT-like interface?

It took Claude Code 13 minutes to build the ChatGPT-like interface.

What was the cost of using Quen 3 Coder during the challenge?

The cost of using Quen 3 Coder was around $1.

How long did it take Kim K2 Instruct to set up the project?

Kim K2 Instruct managed to set up the project in about 2 minutes and 20 seconds.

What are some benefits of using Kim K2 over Quen 3?

Kim K2 is faster and created a functional ChatGPT chatbot at a lower cost than Quen 3 Coder.

What did the speaker suggest about the future of Chinese AI models?

The speaker suggested that these models are getting really good and should not be ignored.

What does the speaker offer for non-technical founders?

The speaker offers an AI coding blueprint and access to a private Discord community for direct interaction and support.

What did the speaker say about Quen 3's performance at the end of the video?

The speaker expressed disappointment in Quen 3's performance, stating it did not deliver as expected.

More video recommendations

Share to: