EN

AI Video Generators Ranked from Worst to Best (2025)

#AI Tools
2025-11-27 21:159 min read

Content Introduction
Ask Questions

In this video, the presenter tests and ranks 16 various AI video generators, focusing on their realism, features, and output quality. Due to the overwhelming number of AI video models available, the host aims to identify the top performers and those to avoid after experiencing disappointment with previous generators. Using Open Art for testing efficiency, the presenter conducts side-by-side comparisons with the same prompt, rating the models from S tier to F tier based on their results. Throughout the review, models like Cling 2.5, Sora 2, and Google VO 3.1 stand out for their quality, while older or less capable models struggle to deliver satisfactory results. The video concludes with recommendations on using Open Art to easily compare and find the AI video generation tool that fits individual needs best.

Key Information

  • The narrator expresses the overwhelming influx of AI video generators being released daily.
  • They decided to test 16 popular AI video generators in order to rank which ones deliver quality outputs.
  • The testing tool used for ranking is called Open Art, which allows access to multiple generators without needing separate subscriptions.
  • The results of the tests were ranked, with the best performers being Sora 2, Cling 2.5, and Google Vo 3.1, while Cling 1.6 and Hyo Standard performed poorly.
  • Factors taken into account for ranking included realism, motion, lighting, and overall quality of the generated videos.

Timeline Analysis

Content Keywords

AI Video Generators

The script discusses the increasing prevalence of AI video generators, noting that there are numerous options available, making it challenging for users to select the most suitable products. The narrator tests 16 popular AI video generators side by side to determine which ones deliver quality results.

Open Art

Open Art is introduced as a tool for ranking AI video generators, providing a streamlined workflow that avoids the need for multiple subscriptions. It allows users to test different AI models conveniently.

Cling 2.5

Cling 2.5 is highlighted as a leading AI video generator, praised for its movie-like movement, realism, and affordable pricing. It receives an S tier rating for its performance.

Cling 2.1

The previous version, Cling 2.1, is also tested, yielding good results but falling short of Cling 2.5, earning a B tier rating.

Cling 1.6

Cling 1.6, an older model, performed poorly compared to its successors, ultimately receiving an F tier rating.

Cance

Cance is briefly discussed as a lesser-known AI video generator, noted for its capability to create multi-shot videos but has reportedly fallen behind in competitiveness.

Sora 2

Sora 2 by OpenAI is introduced as a high-end model recognized for its advanced realism and integrated audio, receiving an S tier rating for superior quality.

Hyo Models

Hyo models are tested, with specific focus on Minax Hyo 2.3 and Hyo Standard. While Minax Hyo 2.3 performs well, Hyo Standard is rated F tier due to inferior quality.

Video Q1

Video Q1 is evaluated for its fast and stylized outputs, impressing the narrator and receiving a B tier rating for quality.

Pixverse 5

Pixverse 5 is praised for offering a good balance between price and quality, ultimately receiving a B tier rating due to its overall impressive output.

Google VO models

The Google VO lineup is highlighted for its strong cinematic tone and realistic results, with VO 3.1 standing out and earning an S tier rating.

Related questions&answers

What is the purpose of the video?

The video is testing and ranking various AI video generators based on their performance and output.

How many AI video generators are being tested?

16 AI video generators are being tested in the video.

What tool is being used for ranking the video generators?

The tool used for ranking the video generators is called Open Art.

What is the primary feature of the Cling family of AI video generators?

The Cling family is known for its high realism, movie-like movement, and affordable pricing.

What are the main criteria for evaluating the AI video generators?

The main criteria are realism, texture quality, motion smoothness, and overall output quality.

Which AI video generator received the highest ranking?

Sora 2 received the highest ranking, classified as S tier.

What common issues were found in the older AI video generators?

Older AI video generators, like Cling 1.6 and Hyo Standard, were noted to have poorer performance, unrealistic textures, and laggy motion.

What advantages does Open Art provide for testing AI video generators?

Open Art allows users to test multiple models in one place without having to purchase multiple subscriptions.

How did the ranking process work in the video?

The ranking was done based on testing each generator with the same prompts and evaluating their outputs side-by-side.

Where can viewers find the link to sign up for Open Art?

The link to sign up for Open Art can be found in the description of the video.

More video recommendations

Share to: