Play Video: 別掉入谷歌陷阱 Google is a fantastic tool. 谷歌是一個非常棒的工具。 I use it all day, every day, just like you. 我和你一樣,每天、整天都在使用它。 However, relying on Google without understanding the fundamentals of a subject can be detrimental to your long-term growth. 然而,在不了解一個主題的基礎知識情況下,僅僅依賴谷歌,可能對你的長期成長不利。 The ease of finding answers quickly through Google can create a false sense of competence and hinder your ability to think critically and problem-solve independently. 透過谷歌快速找到答案的容易性,可能會產生一種虛假的勝任感,並阻礙你獨立批判性思考和解決問題的能力。 Think of it this way: if you constantly rely on a calculator to solve simple math problems, you'll eventually lose your ability to do mental math. 以這種方式思考:如果你不斷地依賴計算機來解決簡單的數學問題,你最終會失去心算的能力。 Similarly, if you always Google the answer to every question, you won't develop the essential skills of reasoning, analysis, and intuition. 同樣地,如果你總是谷歌搜尋每個問題的答案,你將無法培養推理、分析和直覺等基本技能。 The Google Trap is the illusion of knowledge that comes from readily available information masking a lack of true understanding. 谷歌陷阱是一種知識的錯覺,它來自於容易獲得的資訊掩蓋了對真實理解的缺乏。 To avoid this trap, prioritize foundational learning before turning to Google for answers. 為了避免這個陷阱,在向谷歌尋求答案之前,請優先考慮基礎學習。 Take the time to understand the underlying principles, concepts, and theories of a subject. 花時間去理解一個主題的潛在原則、概念和理論。 Engage in active learning techniques, such as reading books, taking notes, and practicing problem-solving. 參與主動學習技巧,例如閱讀書籍、做筆記和練習解決問題。 Question the information you find on Google and cross-reference it with other sources to ensure accuracy and validity. 質疑你在谷歌上找到的資訊,並透過其他來源進行交叉驗證,以確保準確性和有效性。 Use Google as a supplement to your learning, not a replacement for it. 將谷歌作為你學習的補充,而不是替代品。 By focusing on building a strong foundation of knowledge and cultivating critical thinking skills, you can harness the power of Google without falling into the trap of superficial understanding. 透過專注於建立強大的知識基礎並培養批判性思維能力,你可以駕馭谷歌的力量,而不會掉入膚淺理解的陷阱。

別掉入谷歌陷阱 Google is a fantastic tool. 谷歌是一個非常棒的工具。 I use it all day, every day, just like you. 我和你一樣,每天、整天都在使用它。 However, relying on Google without understanding the fundamentals of a subject can be detrimental to your long-term growth. 然而,在不了解一個主題的基礎知識情況下,僅僅依賴谷歌,可能對你的長期成長不利。 The ease of finding answers quickly through Google can create a false sense of competence and hinder your ability to think critically and problem-solve independently. 透過谷歌快速找到答案的容易性,可能會產生一種虛假的勝任感,並阻礙你獨立批判性思考和解決問題的能力。 Think of it this way: if you constantly rely on a calculator to solve simple math problems, you'll eventually lose your ability to do mental math. 以這種方式思考:如果你不斷地依賴計算機來解決簡單的數學問題,你最終會失去心算的能力。 Similarly, if you always Google the answer to every question, you won't develop the essential skills of reasoning, analysis, and intuition. 同樣地,如果你總是谷歌搜尋每個問題的答案,你將無法培養推理、分析和直覺等基本技能。 The Google Trap is the illusion of knowledge that comes from readily available information masking a lack of true understanding. 谷歌陷阱是一種知識的錯覺,它來自於容易獲得的資訊掩蓋了對真實理解的缺乏。 To avoid this trap, prioritize foundational learning before turning to Google for answers. 為了避免這個陷阱,在向谷歌尋求答案之前,請優先考慮基礎學習。 Take the time to understand the underlying principles, concepts, and theories of a subject. 花時間去理解一個主題的潛在原則、概念和理論。 Engage in active learning techniques, such as reading books, taking notes, and practicing problem-solving. 參與主動學習技巧,例如閱讀書籍、做筆記和練習解決問題。 Question the information you find on Google and cross-reference it with other sources to ensure accuracy and validity. 質疑你在谷歌上找到的資訊,並透過其他來源進行交叉驗證,以確保準確性和有效性。 Use Google as a supplement to your learning, not a replacement for it. 將谷歌作為你學習的補充,而不是替代品。 By focusing on building a strong foundation of knowledge and cultivating critical thinking skills, you can harness the power of Google without falling into the trap of superficial understanding. 透過專注於建立強大的知識基礎並培養批判性思維能力,你可以駕馭谷歌的力量,而不會掉入膚淺理解的陷阱。

2025-08-07 20:2328 分鐘 閱讀

內容介紹

消費者已不再只是單純的搜尋,他們正在各種線上平台上做決定。傳統的 SEO,專注於 Google 排名,正變得越來越沒有效用,因為購買決策越來越受到在 TikTok、Reddit、Amazon 和 Chat GPT 等平台上的討論、評論和 AI 推薦的影響。為了保持關聯性,企業需要轉向「無所不在搜尋優化」—— 一種針對整個網路上,而非僅僅 Google 上的決策時刻進行優化的策略。重點不再是內容的絕對數量,而是策略性的存在和針對特定平台的策略。在 AI 驅動推薦的時代,於多個平台建立信任和驗證,是保持可見度的途徑。

關鍵信息

  • 消費者正透過多種平台和接觸點,快速地做出購買決策。
  • 傳統的搜索引擎優化 (SEO) 效果正日漸衰退,因為只有 27% 的搜尋活動發生在 Google 上,而另外 73% 則分散在 Instagram、TikTok、Amazon、Reddit、YouTube 和 AI 聊天機器人等平台。
  • 現代消費者的旅程不再是一個漏斗,而是在多個平台上同時發生的微決策的集合體。
  • 「全面優化」是指策略性地於多個平台上的確切決策時刻展現,而不僅僅是專注於 Google 排名。
  • 每個平台 (TikTok、YouTube、Chat GPT、Amazon、Instagram、Reddit) 都有其自身的決策程式碼和消費者心理,應仔細將相應的內容與平台匹配。
  • 講者推薦一個名為 RICE 的工具,這個工具能夠協助決定及排序資源,以便判斷哪個平台值得投入精力。

時間軸分析

內容關鍵字

Okay, I will translate "Google Trap" into traditional Chinese sentence by sentence.**Original:** Google Trap**Translation:** 谷歌陷阱 (Gǔgē xiànjǐng)

許多企業都專注於 Google 排名,但消費者正在 TikTok、Reddit 和 Amazon 等其他平台上做出購買決策。忽略這些平台會導致錯失良機和轉換率停滯不前,即使 Google 排名良好也是如此。尼爾·帕特爾(Neil Patel)稱之為「Google 陷阱」,指的是優化 Google 最終會錯失在其他地方做出決定的客戶。

Okay, here's the translation of "Search Everywhere Optimization" into traditional Chinese, sentence by sentence:**Original:** Search Everywhere Optimization**Translation:** 全方位搜尋最佳化 (Quán fāngwèi sōuxún zuìjiā huà)---**Explanation of the Translation:*** **全方位 (Quán fāngwèi):** Means "all-around," "all-dimensional," or "every direction." It conveys the idea of "everywhere."* **搜尋 (Sōuxún):** Means "search" or "searching."* **最佳化 (Zuìjiā huà):** Means "optimization" or "to optimize." It translates literally to "best-ification", indicating the process of making something the best.This translation aims to capture the essence of "Search Everywhere Optimization" as improving search capabilities across all areas or aspects.

「無處不在的優化」指的是針對所有做出決策的平台進行優化,而不僅僅是一個搜尋引擎。傳統的SEO專注於被發現;這種新的方法側重於在整個網路上被選擇。

Okay, please provide the article you want me to translate. I will translate it sentence by sentence into traditional Chinese.

消費者行為已從傳統搜尋轉變為在 Instagram、TikTok、亞馬遜、Reddit、YouTube 和 Chat GPT 等多個平台上快速做出決策。這種現代消費者旅程就像是一系列微決策的集合,其中每個平台在決策過程中都發揮著不同的心理功能。

平台專屬策略

每個平台都有其自身的決策引擎、心理學和演算法。 因此,你不能在所有平台上使用同一套策略。 在 TikTok 上有效的東西在 LinkedIn 上會失敗,而在亞馬遜上能帶來轉換率的東西在 Reddit 上會慘敗。 重要的是要根據每個平台的決策程式碼來量身定制內容和形象。

Okay, I'll translate "Visibility vs. Validation" sentence by sentence into traditional Chinese. Here we go:**Original:** Visibility vs. Validation**Translation:** 可見性與驗證 (Kějiàn xìng yǔ yànzhèng)**Explanation of Translation:*** **Visibility:** 可見性 (Kějiàn xìng) - Refers to the quality of being easily seen or noticed.* **vs.:** 與 (yǔ) - "Versus" or "and" in this context, indicating a comparison or contrast.* **Validation:** 驗證 (Yànzhèng) - The act of confirming or proving the validity of something.

能見度體現在搜尋結果中呈現,而肯定則是在對話中被提及。能見度就像擁有一個抖音帳號;肯定就像有人在他們自己的抖音影片中提及你的品牌。

在人工智慧時代,驗證的力量。

人工智慧會總結資訊,且很大程度上受到其他使用者已經信任並驗證過的來源所驅動。在人工智慧時代,值得信賴的資訊來源至關重要。為了讓您的服務或產品在人工智慧眼中被視為有效,其他人需要從您的品牌中看到價值。 因此,將您的品牌編織到跨平台的信任網絡中是絕對必要的。

Okay, I will translate the title and then translate the article sentence by sentence as you provide it.**Title:** Strategic Presence (戰略性存在)Now, provide the article text one sentence at a time and I will translate it for you into traditional Chinese.

「策略性存在感」指的是,當有人向 ChatGPT 請求推薦時,你的品牌必須出現在回應之中。這應該像是──當有人在 Reddit 上尋求誠實意見時:你的公司需要被提及。最終目標並非在於出現在每個平台上,而是被編織進跨平台的信任網絡之中。

Okay, I will translate "RICE Framework" sentence by sentence into Traditional Chinese. Please provide the content you want me to translate. I need the article content to accurately translate it sentence by sentence without omission.For example, if all you give me is *"The RICE framework is a prioritization method."*, I will translate it as:* RICE 框架是一種優先排序的方法。(RICE kuàngjià shì yī zhǒng yōuxiān páixù de fāngfǎ.)

請運用 RICE 框架來決定平台的優先順序:R (每天有多少人在該平台上搜尋?), I (這對您的業務會產生多大的影響?), C (您有多大信心能在此平台上成功?), E (您執行起來有多容易?)

相關問題與答案

Okay, here's an explanation of "Search Everywhere Optimization":**Search Everywhere Optimization** refers to a range of techniques aimed at improving the speed, efficiency, and relevance of search functions across an entire platform, application, or system. Instead of focusing on just one specific search feature (like a product search on an e-commerce site), it looks at *all* the places where users can initiate searches and aims to make them work better.Here's a breakdown of key aspects:* **Scope:** It's a holistic approach, considering every area where search is used, from simple text finders to complex data exploration tools.* **Goals:** The primary goals are typically: * **Speed:** Reducing the time it takes for a search to return results. * **Accuracy/Relevance:** Ensuring that the results are highly relevant to the user's query. * **Efficiency:** Minimizing the resource usage (CPU, memory, network bandwidth) required to perform searches. * **User Experience:** Making the search process intuitive and easy to use.* **Techniques:** The specific optimization techniques used can vary widely depending on the system and the type of data being searched. Some common examples include: * **Indexing:** Creating data structures (like inverted indexes) that allow for rapid lookups of information. * **Caching:** Storing frequently accessed search results or data to avoid repeated computations. * **Query optimization:** Rewriting or re-structuring search queries to make them more efficient. * **Data partitioning:** Dividing the data into smaller, more manageable chunks that can be searched in parallel. * **Algorithm selection:** Choosing the most appropriate search algorithm for the specific data and query types. For example, using fuzzy searching for typo-tolerant queries, or using specialized algorithms for geographic searches. * **Infrastructure optimization:** Optimizing the underlying hardware and software infrastructure used for searching (e.g., using faster storage, optimizing network configurations). * **Relevance ranking:** Fine-tuning the algorithms that determine the order in which search results are displayed, so that the most relevant results appear first. * **Autocomplete/Suggestions:** Providing users with search suggestions as they type to help them formulate better queries and find what they are looking for more quickly. * **Search Analytics & Monitoring:** Tracking search performance metrics (e.g., query response times, click-through rates) so you can identify areas for improvement and measure the impact of your optimizations.* **Context:** Search Everywhere Optimization is particularly important in: * Large and complex systems with many different types of data. * Applications where speed and accuracy of search are critical for user satisfaction. * Environments where resources are limited (e.g., mobile devices).**In essence, Search Everywhere Optimization is about making search a consistently fast, accurate, and efficient experience throughout a system, not just in one or two specific areas.** It requires a broad understanding of the system's architecture, data, and user needs.

搜尋無所不在的優化不僅僅是在 Google 上進行優化,而是針對所有做出決策的平台進行優化。

Okay, here's a translation of the question "What is the difference between traditional SEO and Search Everywhere Optimization?" into traditional Chinese, sentence by sentence:**Original:** What is the difference between traditional SEO and Search Everywhere Optimization?**Translation:*** **What is the difference:** 甚麼是不同之處? (Shénme shì bùtóng zhī chù?)* **between traditional SEO:** 在傳統搜索引擎優化 (SEO) *(zài chuántǒng sōusuǒ yǐnqíng yōuhuà (SEO))* or 傳統搜尋引擎最佳化 *(chuántǒng sōuxún yǐnqíng zuìjiā huà (SEO))** **and Search Everywhere Optimization?** 與無所不在搜尋優化之間? (yǔ wúsǔobúzài sōuxún yōuhuà zhī jiān?)* **Full Sentence:** 甚麼是傳統搜索引擎優化 (SEO) 與無所不在搜尋優化之間的不同之處? OR 甚麼是傳統搜尋引擎最佳化 (SEO) 與無所不在搜尋優化之間的不同之處?**Explanation of Choices & Nuances:*** **搜索引擎優化 (SEO) / 搜尋引擎最佳化 (SEO):** Both are valid translations of "SEO." 搜索引擎優化 is a direct translation, while 搜尋引擎最佳化 emphasizes "optimization" as making something the "best." I have presented each as an alternative so you can choose based on the context and your preference.* **無所不在搜尋優化:** This translates "Search Everywhere Optimization" quite literally. It captures the idea that the search is happening everywhere.* **的不同之處 (bùtóng zhī chù):** means "the point of difference". This is used at the end to emphasize what needs to be pointed out between the two.Therefore, the best translation depends slightly on context. However, either of the full sentences above are accurate and natural-sounding. I have included both because both character sets are valid for traditional Chinese. Pick the alternative that makes most sense in your specific business/communication context.

傳統的SEO著重於讓用戶在Google上找到你,而無所不在搜尋引擎最佳化則著重於讓你在整個網路上被選擇。

傳統的搜尋引擎優化 (SEO) 不再像過去那樣有效,原因是什麼呢?

消費者的行為已經發生根本性的轉變,人們不再只是在Google上搜尋,而是在多個接觸點上迅速做出決定。

Here's a translation of the question "What are some platforms where consumers are making buying decisions?" into traditional Chinese, sentence by sentence:**Original:** What are some platforms where consumers are making buying decisions?**Translation:*** **What are some platforms:** 哪些平台* **where consumers are making:** 消費者正在做出* **buying decisions?:** 購買決定的?**Combined:** 哪些平台消費者正在做出購買決定的?

Okay, here's the translation of those platforms into traditional Chinese, sentence by sentence:* **TikTok:** 抖音 (Dǒu yīn)* **Reddit:** Reddit (通常直接使用英文名稱,但有時會翻譯為「紅迪」) (Reddit, usually uses the English name directly, but sometimes it is translated as "Hóng dí")* **Amazon:** 亞馬遜 (Yà mǎ xùn)* **YouTube:** YouTube (通常直接使用英文名稱,但有時會翻譯為「優兔」) (YouTube, usually uses the English name directly, but sometimes it is translated as "Yōu tù").* **Chat GPT:** Chat GPT (通常直接使用英文名稱,但有時會翻譯為「聊天機器人GPT」/「ChatGPT聊天機械人」) (Chat GPT, usually uses the English name directly, but sometimes it is translated as "Liáo tiān jī qì rén GPT"/"ChatGPT liáo tiān jī xiè rén").Therefore, here is a combination of the above:* TikTok: 抖音* Reddit: Reddit (紅迪)* Amazon: 亞馬遜* YouTube: YouTube (優兔)* Chat GPT: Chat GPT (聊天機器人GPT/ChatGPT聊天機械人)

The "Google Trap" is a term that doesn't have one single, universally agreed-upon definition. However, it generally refers to a situation where individuals rely so heavily on Google (or search engines in general) for information that it hinders their own cognitive abilities, critical thinking skills, and ability to retain knowledge. Here are some different facets of the idea:* **Over-reliance on readily available information:** Instead of actively trying to remember facts or understand concepts, people simply look them up on Google whenever needed. This can lead to a decreased ability to recall information independently and a shallow understanding of the subject matter.* **Diminished critical thinking:** The "Google Trap" can also manifest as a tendency to accept information found on Google without questioning its source, credibility, or potential biases. This can be particularly problematic when dealing with complex or controversial topics.* **Decreased attention span and focus:** The ease with which we can find information online can also contribute to a shorter attention span. Instead of engaging with a topic in depth, people may jump from one source to another, gathering snippets of information without truly absorbing or synthesizing them.* **Impact on memory:** Some studies suggest that constantly relying on search engines for information can negatively impact our ability to form and retain memories. The brain may not be as motivated to store information it knows it can easily access online.* **Algorithmic bias and filter bubbles:** The results we see on Google are influenced by algorithms that personalize our search results based on our past behavior and preferences. This can create "filter bubbles" where we are only exposed to information that confirms our existing beliefs, limiting our exposure to diverse perspectives.In essence, the "Google Trap" is about the potential negative consequences of over-dependence on search engines for information, leading to a decline in cognitive skills, critical thinking, and memory. It's a cautionary tale about the importance of balancing the benefits of instant access to information with the need to cultivate our own intellectual abilities.

「Google陷阱」指的是當你為了在Google搜尋中獲得能見度而優化時,你的顧客卻在其他地方做出決策。

Without knowing the context of who "Neil" is and where he said this, it's impossible to give a definitive answer. However, I can explain what "strategic presence" generally means, and then give some possibilities based on different situations:**General Meaning of Strategic Presence:**"Strategic presence" broadly refers to **a carefully considered and implemented position (physical, digital, market, etc.) designed to achieve specific strategic goals.** It's about being intentionally located or operating in a place or way that maximizes a desired impact. It's more than just *being* somewhere; it's about *being* there *strategically*.Key components of strategic presence often include:* **Clear Objectives:** What are you trying to achieve? (e.g., market share, brand awareness, access to resources, competitive advantage)* **Targeted Audience:** Who are you trying to reach or influence?* **Resource Allocation:** How are you investing your time, money, and effort?* **Competitive Landscape:** How does your presence compare to competitors?* **Measurement and Evaluation:** How will you determine if your presence is effective?**Possible Interpretations Based on Different Contexts:**Here are some potential meanings, depending on the field Neil is discussing:* **In Business/Marketing:** * **Market Entry:** Entering a new market (geographic, demographic, etc.) strategically, focusing on the right segments and channels. * **Retail Footprint:** Choosing the right locations for physical stores to maximize customer reach and sales. * **Digital Presence:** Optimizing website, social media, and online advertising to reach target customers. It involves focusing on relevant keywords, creating engaging content, and actively participating in online communities. * **Strategic Partnerships:** Forming alliances with other companies to expand reach and access new resources.* **In International Relations/Diplomacy:** * **Military Presence:** Deploying troops, naval forces, or air assets in a specific region to deter aggression, maintain stability, or protect national interests. * **Diplomatic Presence:** Establishing embassies, consulates, and trade missions to foster relationships and promote cooperation with other countries. * **Humanitarian Aid:** Providing assistance to countries in need to build goodwill and strengthen diplomatic ties.* **In Project Management:** * **Stakeholder Engagement:** Actively communicating and collaborating with key stakeholders throughout the project lifecycle to ensure their buy-in and support. * **Resource Allocation:** Ensuring that the right resources (personnel, equipment, funding) are available at the right time to meet project deadlines.* **In Personal Development/Leadership:** * **Professional Networking:** Building relationships with people in your industry to expand your knowledge and opportunities. * **Personal Branding:** Cultivating a consistent and compelling image that reflects your values and expertise.**To get a more accurate interpretation, you need to provide more context, such as:*** **Who is Neil?** (Is he a CEO, a politician, a writer, a friend?)* **Where did he say this?** (In a business meeting, a political speech, a book, a casual conversation?)* **What was the overall topic being discussed?**Once you provide more information, I can give you a much more precise and helpful explanation of what Neil meant by "strategic presence."

以下是一句一句的翻譯:It's about understanding when someone asks Chat GPT for a recommendation and then ensuring that your brand needs to somehow be a possible response.這關係到理解人們何時會向 Chat GPT 尋求建議,並確保你的品牌需要以某種方式成為可能的推薦選項之一。The same holds true for some validating those decisions through Reddit threads, or even just checking out Amazon reviews.同樣地,對於那些通過 Reddit 討論串驗證決策,甚至是僅僅查看亞馬遜評論的人來說,這個道理也適用。

Here is an explanation of the RICE framework:The RICE framework is a prioritization method used to help product managers and teams decide which features, projects, or initiatives to focus on. It provides a structured approach to evaluate and rank potential options based on four factors: Reach, Impact, Confidence, and Effort. By scoring each option based on these factors, you can arrive at a RICE score, which helps you compare and prioritize effectively.Here's a breakdown of each element of the RICE framework:* **Reach:** How many people will this impact in a given time period? This could be users, customers, or any other relevant group. It's typically measured in users per month or quarter. You want to estimate the number of people who will be *affected* by the feature.* **Impact:** How much will this impact each person? This is a subjective assessment, often measured on a scale (e.g., 1-5, with 1 being minimal impact and 5 being massive impact). Consider the degree to which the feature will improve their experience, solve a problem, or achieve a desired outcome. It's difficult to quantify precisely, but try to be consistent in your ratings. Common scales: * 3 = Massive impact * 2 = High impact * 1 = Medium impact * 0.5 = Low impact * 0.25 = Minimal impact* **Confidence:** How confident are you in your Reach and Impact estimates? This is expressed as a percentage (e.g., 80% confidence). Use this to account for the level of uncertainty in your other estimates. If you have very little data to support your reach or impact assumptions, lower your confidence.* **Effort:** How much effort will this take (in person-months or some other unit of labor)? This includes all necessary work, such as design, development, testing, and deployment. Estimate the number of "person-months" (or weeks, days, etc.) required to complete the project. The unit you use should be consistent across all projects being evaluated. Be realistic and consider potential roadblocks.**Calculating the RICE Score:**The RICE score is calculated using the following formula:`RICE Score = (Reach x Impact x Confidence) / Effort`**Using the RICE Framework:**1. **Brainstorm potential features/projects.**2. **For each feature/project, estimate Reach, Impact, Confidence, and Effort.**3. **Calculate the RICE score for each feature/project.**4. **Prioritize features/projects based on their RICE scores, with the highest scores taking precedence.**5. **Document your reasoning and assumptions for each score. This makes the process more transparent and can be useful for future evaluation.****Benefits of the RICE Framework:*** **Data-driven prioritization:** Provides a more objective way to compare and rank options.* **Improved communication:** Facilitates discussions about the relative value of different initiatives.* **Transparency and consistency:** The structured approach makes the prioritization process more transparent and consistent.* **Focus on impact:** Encourages teams to consider the potential impact of their work.* **Reduces personal bias:** It helps to push back against HiPPO (Highest Paid Person's Opinion) because decisions are based on a scoring system.**Limitations of the RICE Framework:*** **Subjectivity:** While it aims for objectivity, Impact and Confidence scores are still subjective estimations.* **Simplification:** The formula simplifies complex factors, which may not always accurately reflect the true value of a project.* **Data dependency:** Requires accurate data for Reach and Effort, which may not always be available.* **Not a replacement for strategic thinking:** Should be used in conjunction with other prioritization methods and an overall product strategy. It helps you prioritize, but it doesn't tell you *what* to prioritize.In summary, the RICE framework is a valuable tool for product teams to prioritize their work by systematically evaluating potential projects based on Reach, Impact, Confidence, and Effort. It helps to make more informed decisions and focus on initiatives that are likely to deliver the greatest value.

RICE 代表著 R(觸及範圍, Reach)、I(影響力, Impact)、C(信心程度, Confidence)以及 E(操作容易度, Ease),這個方法有助於決定優先順序,以便最終選擇專注的平台。

就品牌的整體能見度而言,這真的是一個如此重大的顧慮嗎?

好的,以下為文章逐句翻譯成繁體中文:Yes, because of AI, your brand may not be cited to different searches.是的,由於人工智慧的緣故,您的品牌可能無法在不同的搜尋中被提及。Google handles about 13.7 billion searches a day, but that is only 27% of all search activity.Google 每天經手約 137 億次搜尋,但這僅佔所有搜尋活動的 27%。You need trusted signals on what you are doing instead of actively partaking in every possible SEO option.您需要關於您所做事情的可信訊號,而不是積極參與每種可能的 SEO 選項。

更多視頻推薦

分享至: